🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document offers a flawed assessment of Europe. The document asserts that unrestrained immigration and so-called "progressive" policies pose an existential threat to the continent's identity. Yet, this argument is based on a serious misinterpretation of the reality. The true challenge facing Europe is not cultural but technological and economic backwardness.

A Glaring Growth Divide Separating the US and Europe

Statistics paint a sobering contrast. From 2008 and 2023, American economic output grew by eighty-seven percent, compared to a mere 13.5% increase for the European Union. Over this period, European income per person dropped from over three-quarters to just 50% of the American figure. Remarkably, even Mississippi now has a greater average income than several leading EU nations like Italy and France.

Today, roughly 50% of the global 50 largest tech companies are US-based, while only four are European.

The Technological Deficit: A Critical Question

The growing economic gap is driven by superior efficiency gains in the US, fueled by technological innovation and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of global tech leadership is decidedly US-centric. In the last five decades, hundreds of American startups have grown into enterprises valued at over $10bn, compared with just 14 in the European continent.

This disparity raises a pressing issue: In the race for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and fusion energy, what is the EU positioned? Most analysts agree it is essentially a contest between two between the United States and China, with European nations starting at a significant disadvantage.

Underlying Factors of the Continent's Innovation Gap

Several key reasons explain this innovation chasm.

• Venture Capital: The US boasts a much more robust and agile network for financing new ventures. Europe has yet to establish a genuine capital markets union, which caps the scale of emerging companies.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Excessive and fragmented rules hinder Europe. A US startup can launch a product under one regulatory framework to access a market of hundreds of millions. The European Union, despite a bigger population, is split among twenty-seven separate systems, creating huge internal barriers.
• Cultural Attitudes: Attitudes toward risk-taking vary greatly. In some EU nations, business failure was once viewed with stigma, whereas in the United States, it is often considered a valuable lesson.
• Defense Spending: The United States enjoys a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. Europe's long-term lack of spending in defense has eroded its capacity for breakthrough innovation.

The Road Ahead: Reasons for Cautious Optimism

Despite these challenges, one can find reasons for optimism. European leaders are growing more conscious of the existential challenge and have begun to advance serious reform. Notable analyses on EU competitiveness and the single market highlight the need for sweeping reforms.

Given appropriate incentives and rule changes, Europe's strengths might enable much higher degrees of commercial innovation.

Europe still possesses considerable strengths: skilled human capital, top-tier schools and universities, and world-class labs. Alongside a large internal market and substantial household savings, these foundations have the potential to trigger a surge of investment and entrepreneurship.

Importantly, even if the EU does not take the lead in developing next-generation tech, it can still significantly increase productivity by adopting and adapting innovations from elsewhere.

A Critical Juncture

Europe now stands at a critical crossroads. As the saying goes, decline often happens "gradually and then suddenly". So far, the continent's slide in innovation has been steady. However, without bold steps to tackle its structural weaknesses, today's gradual weakening could turn into a sudden and irreversible loss of world influence.